Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260698›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Modified treatment in cerebral ischemia 1 versus modified treatment in cerebral ischemia 0 before endovascular stroke treatment in middle cerebral artery's M1-occlusion: Predictor for revascularization success and outcome?

Jessica Jesser, Charlotte S Weyland, Arne Potreck, Ulf Neuberger, Michael O Breckwoldt, Min Chen, Silvia Schönenberger, Martin Bendszus, Markus A Möhlenbruch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica JesserDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Charlotte S WeylandDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1374-7854
Arne PotreckDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulf NeubergerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael O BreckwoldtDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Min ChenDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Silvia SchönenbergerDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundLittle is known about the implications for revascularization success of target vessel occlusions (TVOs) with persisting antegrade perfusion before initiation of endovascular stroke treatment (EST) (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia (mTICI 1)) compared to a complete occlusion (mTICI 0). Here, we compared these two states of TVO.MethodsRetrospective, single-center analysis of patients treated for M1-segment middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion with EST from January 2015 until May 2020 in a tertiary stroke center. Primary study endpoint was successful recanalization (mTICI 2c-3) after one thrombectomy attempt. Secondary endpoints were clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days after stroke onset), complication rate, and rate of underlying atherosclerotic disease. The two study groups were compared in univariate analysis including patient characteristics and procedural details.ResultsIn this study, 422/581 patients (72.6%) presented with complete M1-occlusion compared to 159/581 (27.4%) with incomplete M1-occlusion. Neither did the recanalization success rate differ between the study groups nor the rate of complications (mTICI 0: 2.4%, mTICI 1: 0.6%,

Indexed as

Cerebral RevascularizationEndovascular ProceduresInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryIschemic StrokeAgedCerebral AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment Outcomecerebral angiographyMiddle cerebral artery strokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID40260698
PMCPMC12034988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.