ArticleMuscle & nerve2025
Incomplete Presentations in Typical Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsIncomplete forms of typical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) have recently been described, but their frequency and clinical characteristics are uncertain. This study aimed to describe a cohort of patients with incomplete typical CIDP.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 64 consecutive treatment-naïve patients with CIDP. Phenotypes were classified based on detailed motor examinations, and clinical, electrophysiological, and therapeutic characteristics were compared.
resultsNineteen (30%) subjects with typical CIDP presented with an incomplete phenotype; 12 (63.2%) exhibited a proximal arm-sparing pattern, 3 (15.8%) a distal arm-sparing pattern, 3 (15.8%) a pure paraparetic form, and 1 (5.2%) had a pure proximal form. In cases without full motor recovery, 11 (68.8%) maintained their original phenotype, while the rest transitioned to the complete (18.8%) or to another incomplete form (12.5%) due to involvement of previously unaffected segments. Subjects with incomplete typical CIDP had milder pre-treatment disability and weakness compared to those with the complete form, while other clinical and electrodiagnostic features were comparable. As opposed to the complete form, disability in incomplete typical CIDP at diagnosis showed no correlation with muscle strength. DISCUSSION: Incomplete forms were observed in nearly one-third of subjects with typical CIDP. Incomplete typical CIDP represents a milder form of complete typical CIDP; however, its other disease characteristics, including treatment response, are similar, highlighting the importance of its proper prompt recognition as CIDP. Impairments beyond motor weakness, such as more diffuse proprioceptive loss, might play a role in the disability of patients with incomplete typical forms of CIDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.