ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Closed Reduction and Spica Cast Immobilization in Patients Aged 18 Months and Older With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFor children aged 18 months and above with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), treatment typically involves open reduction and hip reconstruction surgery. However, there is limited literature evaluating the efficacy of closed reduction in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of closed reduction and spica cast immobilization treatment for children aged 18 months and above with DDH, as well as the incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) and their associated risk factors.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all children aged 18 months and above undergoing closed reduction and spica cast immobilization for DDH in our institution from January 2014 to December 2020. We found 51 hips suffered from closed reduction failure and identified 51 hips with successful closed reduction that matched the hips in the failure group in terms of age (difference < 1 month), weight (difference < 2 kg), and same gender. For patients with bilateral DDH, we prioritized self-matching, pairing the failed side with the successfully treated side. Relevant clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. Multiple analyses of risk factors for closed reduction failure and ANFH were conducted by logistic regression.
resultsIn all, 61 patients (102 hips) were included in our study, 2 boys and 59 girls. Compared with the success group, the failure group more commonly had a higher International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification (Type III: 23.53% vs. 15.69%; Type IV: 60.78% vs. 23.53%, p < 0.001), a higher preoperative acetabular index (AI) index (39.42 ± 5.50 vs. 34.03 ± 6.15, p < 0.001), and a higher preoperative migration percentage (MP) (0.81 ± 0.27 vs. 0.54 ± 0.36, p < 0.001). Adjusting for other factors, the IHDI classification Types III-IV was the independent factor associated with closed reduction failure. Compared with the IHDI classification Type I, the failure risk of Type III and Type IV was increased 16.87 and 52.13 times, respectively (p < 0.05). ANFH was observed in three patients (4 hips, 4/102, 3.92%). All cases of ANFH occurred in the closed reduction failure group. The higher preoperative MP was related to the ANFH occurrence significantly through the unilateral factor analysis (0.98 ± 0.05 vs. 0.66 ± 0.34, p < 0.001). Adjusting for other factors, we did not find any independent factor regarding the ANFH occurrence (p > 0.05).
conclusionsFor patients aged 18 months and above with DDH, an IHDI classification assessment is necessary before closed reduction and spica cast immobilization. For patients classified as IHDI classification Types III and IV, active consideration of open reduction is advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.