Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260459›Full record

ArticleZoo biology

Feeder Insects: The Ethics of Live Feeding in Zoos and Aquariums.

Bob Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bob FischerTexas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-393X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there is no consensus about whether insects are sentient, the possibility alone raises an important question for zoos and aquariums. What ethical responsibilities, if any, do zoos and aquariums have concerning their feeder insects? There has been very little scholarly discussion of these questions. This is not surprising, as scholars have largely ignored feeder animals. So, this paper takes up two tasks. First, it surveys the main welfare-focused ethical questions associated with feeder animals generally and feeder insects in particular. The aim here is to identify the main considerations that bear on a full assessment of the ethics of using feeder animals as a resource, thereby facilitating future research. Second, in the interest of making practical recommendations in the face of significant moral complexity and uncertainty, this paper adopts a standard institutional ethical framework-the 3Rs-and considers its implications for the use of feeder insects.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimals, ZooAnimal WelfareFeeding BehaviorInsectaAnimals3Rsanimal welfareethicsinsectsprecautionary reasoning

Identifiers

PMID40260459
PMCPMC12335229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.