ArticleClinical epidemiology2025
Burden of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Asian Countries From 1990 to 2021 and Its Projection Until 2030: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Derived Electrocardiogram Analysis for Identification of Carbon Monoxide-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning represents a significant contributor to injury burden across Asia. This study seeks to assess the burden of CO poisoning in Asia from 1990 to 2021 utilizing data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. Methods: Data on the burden of CO poisoning across 49 Asian countries were extracted from GBD 2021. The variations in burden were analyzed according to year, gender, location, age, and Socio-Demographic Index (SDI). Analyses included Joinpoint analysis to evaluate temporal trends, the age-period-cohort model to assess disease burden trends, the slope index of inequality and concentration index for assessing health disparities, frontier analysis for estimating potential outcomes based on developmental stages, and the auto-regressive integrated moving average model to predict the disability-adjusted life year (DALY) rates. Results: During 1990-2021, the age-standardized incidence rate (average annual percent change (AAPC) = -0.83, 95% CI: -0.94 to -0.73), age-standardized mortality rate (AAPC = -2.01, 95% CI: -2.20 to -1.81), and DALY rates (AAPC = -2.39, 95% CI: -2.54 to -2.23) for CO poisoning across Asia declined. In 2021, females experienced a lower burden than males, and countries in higher latitudes bore a greater burden. The burden was more pronounced in extreme age groups, with an elevated cohort risk in the 1967-1971 birth cohort (relative risk (RR) = 1.045, 95% CI: 0.96-1.14). Health inequality analyses showed a reduction in disparities between countries with varying SDI levels. Frontier analysis identified potential improvements in reducing the burden across different countries. However, there was no notable correlation between this burden and SDI levels. The age-standardized disability-adjusted life year rate is predicted to continue declining from 2022 to 2030. Conclusion: This study analyzes the burden of CO poisoning in Asia, revealing a decline from 1990 to 2021, with variations across countries and higher burdens in males and extreme age groups. It suggests a reduction in health inequalities and forecasts a continued decline in the burden by 2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.