Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260425›Full record

ReviewClinical epidemiology2025

Mental Disorders in Danish Hospital Registers: A Review of Content and Possibilities for Epidemiological Research.

Oleguer Plana-Ripoll, Xiaoqin Liu, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Natalie C Momen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oleguer Plana-RipollDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Population Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-7465
Xiaoqin LiuNational Centre for Register-based Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole Köhler-ForsbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henrik Toft SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Population Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4299-7040
Natalie C MomenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9832-8500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Danish national hospital registers are a rich source of data for psychiatric epidemiology. The potential to identify diagnosed mental disorders in the Danish population has resulted in a plethora of important research studies. However, no recent review of these research sources exists. Objective: To review the content, data quality and epidemiological considerations regarding mental disorders in the Danish hospital registers. Methods: We provide information on the setting, history, and data access regarding mental disorders in the Danish hospital registers (defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, F group Mental and behavioural disorder codes). We describe the registration of mental disorders over time in the Danish hospital registers, by providing counts of individuals diagnosed with mental disorders each year, by types of mental disorders, diagnosis, hospital contact, and contact unit. We also provide information on considerations when using these data sources, including data quality. For this, we searched PubMed to identify validation studies of coding of mental disorder diagnoses. Results: Between 1969 and 2022, 1,136,280 individuals (10.7% of all individuals who resided in Denmark in this period) have been registered as having a mental disorder as a primary or secondary diagnosis in a psychiatric unit in Denmark at least once. The type of contact and unit diagnoses were made in varied by mental disorder type. The literature indicates that a large proportion of coded diagnoses in the Danish hospital registers of mental disorders were considered valid. Conclusion: We provide an overview of the available data for investigating mental disorders in the Danish hospital registers. We raise awareness of the limitations researchers should be aware of when using this data and discuss their implications. Careful consideration should be given to these during study design and when reporting findings from register-based studies on diagnosed mental disorders.

Indexed as

epidemiological methodsmental disorders registriesresearch designvalidation studies

Identifiers

PMID40260425
PMCPMC12010038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.