Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260331›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Exploring Current Medical Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis of Internet Usage Patterns and Educational Impact Among Medical Students.

Manisha Pandey, Anita Rani, Prashant K Bajpai, Jyoti Chopra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manisha PandeyAnatomy, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Anita RaniAnatomy, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Prashant K BajpaiCommunity Medicine and Public Health, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Jyoti ChopraAnatomy, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction In recent years, the integration of technology into medical education has profoundly altered conventional learning environments. The extensive use of the internet, digital resources, and online platforms has facilitated rapid access to substantial information for students, thus augmenting their capacity to engage with course content in more dynamic and engaging ways. Nonetheless, along with these benefits, challenges have arisen, particularly in students' management and regulation of their internet use for academic purposes. This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting internet use for study-related purposes and to identify the strengths and challenges in regulating its academic usage. Methods A cross-sectional study was undertaken among 144 first-year MBBS students at a government medical college in Lucknow, India. This study specifically included participants from the first year of the MBBS program, aged between 18 and 25 years. Students who did not provide explicit consent to participate or were absent on the designated day of data collection were excluded. Data were gathered using a predesigned, semi-structured questionnaire addressing demographics, internet usage patterns, preferences, and perceptions. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 24.0. Results While 108 (75%) of students preferred textbooks, 99 (68.8%) used the internet for study-related activities. Google Chrome (N=79, 79.8%) was the preferred search engine, and Wikipedia (N=63, 63.6%) was the most common database. Mobile internet access (N=59, 60%) and Android devices (N=86, 86.9%) were predominant. Most students (N=76, 76.8%) perceived the content reliability as moderate (based on students' subjective perceptions), with only 33 (33.3%) fully satisfied with internet services. Slow internet speed (based on students' subjective perceptions) was the primary challenge reported by 63 (63.6%) students. Conclusions The study highlights the evolving digital learning landscape in medical education, with a mix of traditional and online resources being utilized. While the internet offers benefits like unlimited access to study materials, challenges such as slow speeds persist. Future research should focus on enhancing content reliability and user satisfaction and exploring the impact of emerging technologies.

Indexed as

digital learningfirst-year studentsinternet usemedical educationonline resourcesstudy habits

Identifiers

PMID40260331
PMCPMC12011279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.