ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025
Racial Disparities in Utilization of Medications and Disease Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of risankizumab vs ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease: a propensity score-matched multicenter retrospective cohort study.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Genomic Insights Into Inflammatory Bowel Disease in United States Hispanic Participants: An Ancestry-Focused Study.Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Population-Level Gastroenterology and Hepatology: A Comprehensive Review of Public Health Applications and Quantitative Impact.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Disparities in Outcomes for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease at a Private vs Public Hospital in New York City.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although traditionally associated with White European ancestry, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased among different races and ethnicities. Large studies conducted in the United States and Canada have identified more complex disease phenotypes among Black patients. Our study aimed to investigate disparities in IBD treatments and outcomes between Black and White patients in the United States. Methods: Using the TriNetX database, adult IBD patients were divided into 2 groups based on race: Black and White patients with IBD, Crohn's disease (CD), or ulcerative colitis (UC). Medical therapy and disease outcomes were evaluated in both groups with 1:1 propensity-score matching. Methodologic limitations include the potential for missing data, lack of information on socioeconomic strata, and patient-level medication coverage plans. Results: In comparison to White patients, Black patients with CD were less likely to receive advanced therapies; Adalimumab (adjusted odds ratio- aOR 0.89), Certolizumab (0.81), Vedolizumab (0.66), Ustekinumab (0.82), or Tofacitinib (0.58). Black patients with UC were less likely to receive advanced therapies; Adalimumab (0.83), Golimumab (0.62), Vedolizumab (0.69), Ustekinumab (0.73), or Tofacitinib (0.55). Black patients with IBD were at higher odds of utilizing corticosteroids (CD 1.18 and UC 1.20) and opioids (CD 1.26 and UC 1.09). Black patients with CD had higher rates of hospitalization (1.35) and perianal abscess (1.56), perianal fistula (1.28), and intestinal fistula (1.38). Black patients with UC had higher rates of hospitalization (1.29), Clostridioides difficile infection (1.11), and toxic megacolon (1.34). Conclusions: There were racial disparities in IBD medical therapy and disease outcomes. Black IBD patients had lower treatment with advanced therapies, higher opioid and corticosteroid use, and higher IBD-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.