ArticleOman medical journal2024
Case Series of Q Fever Infection: A 15-year Experience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman.
Article in Oman medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis, yet its prevalence may be underestimated due to the challenges in diagnosis. We present a series of cases where patients were treated for Q fever infection based primarily on their clinical features and available laboratory tests, highlighting the difficulties in establishing the diagnosis. Methods: This 15-year case series was observed from January 2009 to November 2023 at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman. Relevant patient information was obtained from the electronic hospital records under the ethical approval MREC # 3139. Results: We treated 17 patients from a total of 1481 patients tested. The median age was 38 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.4:1. Fever was the most common symptom, and six patients experienced weight loss. Hepatobiliary, respiratory, neurological, and musculoskeletal symptoms occurred in 10, six, five, and four patients, respectively. Three patients developed rashes during their illness. Two patients had definite infective endocarditis, one had probable infective endocarditis, and two patients had pericardial effusion. Conclusions: Q fever should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a wide range of clinical presentations. However, it can be clinically challenging, and serological test interpretation can be difficult in areas of endemicity and with limited diagnostic tests. A combination of compatible clinical illnesses and appropriate diagnostic tests is necessary for accurate diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.