ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Development and validation of a 16-gene T-cell- related prognostic model in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Machine Learning and Multiomics to Construct a Tumor-Specific T Cell Signature for Prognostic Assessment and Precision Medicine in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Prediction model for cytomegalovirus infection following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with β-thalassemia major.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibits variable T-cell responses, influencing prognosis and outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 1,027 NSCLC and 108 non-cancerous samples from TCGA using ssGSEA, WGCNA, and differential expression analysis to identify T-cell-related subtypes. A prognostic model was constructed using LASSO Cox regression and externally validated with GEO datasets (GSE50081, GSE31210, GSE30219). Immune cell infiltration and drug sensitivity were assessed. Gene expression alterations were validated in NSCLC tissues using qRT-PCR. Results: A 16-gene prognostic model (LATS2, LDHA, CKAP4, COBL, DSG2, MAPK4, AKAP12, HLF, CD69, BAIAP2L2, FSTL3, CXCL13, PTX3, SMO, KREMEN2, HOXC10) was established based on their strong association with T-cell activity and NSCLC prognosis. The model effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups with significant survival differences, demonstrating strong predictive performance (AUCs of 0.68, 0.72, and 0.69 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in the training cohort). External validation confirmed its robustness. A nomogram combining risk scores and clinical factors improved survival prediction (AUCs>0.6). High-risk patients responded better to AZD5991-1720, an MCL1 inhibitor, while low-risk patients showed improved responses to IGF1R-3801-1738, an IGF1R inhibitor, suggesting that risk stratification may help optimize treatment selection based on tumor-specific vulnerabilities. qRT-PCR validation confirmed the differential expression of model genes in NSCLC tissues, consistent with TCGA data. Conclusion: We identified a 16-gene T-cell-related prognostic model for NSCLC, which stratifies patients by risk and predicts treatment response, aiding personalized therapy decisions. However, prospective validation is needed to confirm its clinical applicability. Potential limitations such as sample size and generalizability should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.