Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260230›Full record

ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Managing severe (and open) pelvic disruption.

Alexander L Eastman, April Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander L EastmanUS Department of Homeland Security, Irving, Texas, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-9714-1710
April MillerTrauma Services, Medical Center of Plano, Plano, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open pelvic fractures are a rare yet catastrophic injury pattern, often resulting from high-energy trauma such as motor vehicle collisions, motorcycle accidents, and pedestrian impacts. They account for only 2%-4% of all pelvic fractures, but their severity lies in the complex anatomy of the pelvis and its associated structures, including the vasculature, bowel, bladder, and genital organs. Mortality rates range from 15% to 50%, with some studies reporting rates as high as 70% in cases involving severe perineal or rectal injuries. These injuries pose two main risks to survival: hemorrhagic shock in the acute phase and pelvic sepsis during the later phases of recovery. Acute hemorrhage can occur from arterial injury (eg, internal iliac arteries), venous plexuses, or bony sources. Delayed deaths are often caused by sepsis due to fecal contamination of wounds or infected hematomas. Additionally, these fractures are often associated with other life-threatening injuries, including intra-abdominal trauma, genitourinary disruptions, and neurovascular compromise, further complicating their management. Management of these injuries has evolved significantly with advancements in hemorrhage control techniques such as preperitoneal pelvic packing and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to address the multifaceted challenges posed by these injuries.

Indexed as

fractures, bone

Identifiers

PMID40260230
PMCPMC12010346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.