ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Managing severe (and open) pelvic disruption.
Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catastrophic pelvic-perineal injuries with traumatic hemipelvectomy following a motorcycle collision: a multidisciplinary reconstruction case report.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- The PEARL Score for Predicting Postoperative Complication Risk in Patients with Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: Development of a Novel Comprehensive Risk Scoring System.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Damage Control Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Abdomino-Pelvic Packing in Multimodal Hemorrhage Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Psychological impact of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pelvic fractures with lumbosacral plexus injury.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open pelvic fractures are a rare yet catastrophic injury pattern, often resulting from high-energy trauma such as motor vehicle collisions, motorcycle accidents, and pedestrian impacts. They account for only 2%-4% of all pelvic fractures, but their severity lies in the complex anatomy of the pelvis and its associated structures, including the vasculature, bowel, bladder, and genital organs. Mortality rates range from 15% to 50%, with some studies reporting rates as high as 70% in cases involving severe perineal or rectal injuries. These injuries pose two main risks to survival: hemorrhagic shock in the acute phase and pelvic sepsis during the later phases of recovery. Acute hemorrhage can occur from arterial injury (eg, internal iliac arteries), venous plexuses, or bony sources. Delayed deaths are often caused by sepsis due to fecal contamination of wounds or infected hematomas. Additionally, these fractures are often associated with other life-threatening injuries, including intra-abdominal trauma, genitourinary disruptions, and neurovascular compromise, further complicating their management. Management of these injuries has evolved significantly with advancements in hemorrhage control techniques such as preperitoneal pelvic packing and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to address the multifaceted challenges posed by these injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.