Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260192›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Clancy A Hall, Gabriel C Conroy, Dominique A Potvin

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clancy A HallSchool of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia.
Gabriel C ConroySchool of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia.
Dominique A PotvinSchool of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Petrie, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-9297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With over half of all avian species in decline globally, zoo-based recovery programs are increasingly relied upon to save species from extinction. The success of such programs not only rests with political will, but also in our understanding of species' breeding biology and how individuals and populations respond to changes in their environment. Sex skews, that is, an imbalance in the optimal number of males to females, is an underlying mechanism of population decline in some threatened species.

Indexed as

BirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesSex RatioAnimalsAnimals, ZooFemaleMaleBirdsCaptive breedingInsurance populationIntegrated managementOne plan approachSex allocationSex ratio

Identifiers

PMID40260192
PMCPMC12011015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.