ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Establishing a prediction model for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis in emergency inpatients in the post epidemic era.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the risk factors of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT) in emergency inpatients in the post-epidemic era, and to establish a prediction model for identifying high-risk patients of LEDVT. Methods: Emergency inpatients admitted to our hospital from June 2022 to June 2023 were divided into two groups: the epidemic group and the post-epidemic group. The baseline characteristics, blood routine, liver and kidney function, blood coagulation function, and LE ultrasonography were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic analysis and receiver operating character (ROC) curve were used to establish and evaluate the effectiveness of a prediction model for LEDVT in the post-epidemic era. Results: A total of 967 patients were analyzed, including 388 cases in the epidemic group and 579 cases in the post-epidemic group. The portion of LEDVT cases in the post-epidemic group (33.2%) was significantly higher than that in the epidemic group (26.8%, Conclusion: The incidence of LEDVT in emergency inpatients in the post-epidemic era was significantly higher than that in the epidemic period. Age, smoking and drinking history, and glycosylated hemoglobin are at high risk for thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.