ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Observational study of the recent efficacy and economy of itraconazole vs. voriconazole in perioperative pulmonary aspergillosis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Treatment for Pulmonary Aspergillosis: A Thirty-Year Single-Center Experience and the Contemporary Role of Surgery.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antifungal therapy is a common treatment option for pulmonary aspergillosis, but its use to prevent recurrence and relieve symptoms in patients with pulmonary aspergillosis remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the short-term efficacy and cost of itraconazole vs. voriconazole in the treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis during the perioperative period. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 55 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis who underwent surgery and received itraconazole or voriconazole as antifungal therapy between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2022, at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University. We analyzed the effects of different antifungal therapies on the incidence of adverse events, short-term efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary aspergillosis treatment. Results: Except for the younger average age of patients in the itraconazole group, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as sex, BMI, underlying lung disease, accompanying symptoms, and lesion location between the voriconazole and itraconazole groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events or short-term efficacy, including recovery, symptom improvement, and recurrence rates, during the administration of the antifungal regimens between the two groups. Regarding economic cost efficiency, there was no significant difference in the median hospitalization costs between the two groups. However, despite the longer antifungal treatment duration in the itraconazole group, the cost of itraconazole was significantly lower than that of voriconazole. Conclusion: Both itraconazole and voriconazole effectively prevented the recurrence of pulmonary aspergillosis. They are similar in terms of the incidence of adverse events and short-term efficacy; however, itraconazole is more economical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.