ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Structured noise champagne: an empirical Bayesian algorithm for electromagnetic brain imaging with structured noise.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetoencephalography in human neuroscience research: planning, piloting, implementation and quality assurance.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Inferring neural sources from electroencephalography: foundations and frontiers.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electromagnetic brain imaging is the reconstruction of brain activity from non-invasive recordings of electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and also from invasive ones such as the intracranial recording of electrocorticography (ECoG), intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), and stereo electroencephalography EEG (sEEG). These modalities are widely used techniques to study the function of the human brain. Efficient reconstruction of electrophysiological activity of neurons in the brain from EEG/MEG measurements is important for neuroscience research and clinical applications. An enduring challenge in this field is the accurate inference of brain signals of interest while accounting for all sources of noise that contribute to the sensor measurements. The statistical characteristic of the noise plays a crucial role in the success of the brain source recovery process, which can be formulated as a sparse regression problem. Method: In this study, we assume that the dominant environment and biological sources of noise that have high spatial correlations in the sensors can be expressed as a structured noise model based on the variational Bayesian factor analysis. To the best of our knowledge, no existing algorithm has addressed the brain source estimation problem with such structured noise. We propose to apply a robust empirical Bayesian framework for iteratively estimating the brain source activity and the statistics of the structured noise. In particular, we perform inference of the variational Bayesian factor analysis (VBFA) noise model iteratively in conjunction with source reconstruction. Results: To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, we perform experiments on both simulated and real datasets. Our algorithm achieves superior performance as compared to several existing benchmark algorithms. Discussion: A key aspect of our algorithm is that we do not require any additional baseline measurements to estimate the noise covariance from the sensor data under scenarios such as resting state analysis, and other use cases wherein a noise or artifactual source occurs only in the active period but not in the baseline period (e.g., neuro-modulatory stimulation artifacts and speech movements).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.