ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Occupational health and safety regulations in China: development process, enforcement challenges, and solutions.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of personal protective equipment in preventing occupational injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Poisoning Deaths in a Workshop for Ceremonial Papermaking - China, May 2025.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2026Article
- Dynamic reward-penalty incentives and occupational health governance: an evolutionary game analysis with public health implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Credit-frequency compliance paradox and dual-track hazard evolution in urban occupational health.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational health is closely related to China's public health system and the construction of a healthy China. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the current health status of China's occupational population and the dilemmas faced by prevention and treatment work. Methods: The following databases were utilized: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Keywords used included "occupational health," "occupational hygiene," "occupational disease prevention," "occupational risks," "occupational health regulations," and "China." The search was limited to articles published from 2000 to the present to ensure the inclusion of the most recent studies and regulatory updates. Results: It is found that changes in industrial structure have led to significant differences in the production environment and labor practices of different occupations, which in turn have triggered the gradual emergence of various types of occupational diseases. The existing legislative system of occupational diseases protects the rights and interests of workers to a certain extent, but there are still some shortcomings. The main dilemmas faced by the prevention and control work include the complexity and diversity of occupational disease hazards, the lack of implementation of prevention and control measures, and the imperfection of the legislative system. Conclusion: This study proposes directions and measures for good prevention and control of occupational diseases, and explores the road of prevention and control of occupational diseases with Chinese characteristics. By improving the legislative guarantee, optimizing the implementation mechanism, and deepening the social co-governance, a sustainable occupational health management system adapted to the needs of industrial upgrading will eventually be constructed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.