ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Risk factors associated with severe progression of Parkinson's disease: random forest and logistic regression models.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Locus and Machine Learning-Based Assessment of SNCA Variants in Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Early risk stratification of postoperative pneumonia after brain tumor surgery using routine perioperative variables: development and prospective multicenter validation of an interpretable prediction model.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic classification of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease using subject-level stratified machine-learning analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with significant variability in disease progression. Identifying clinical and environmental risk factors associated with severe progression is essential for early diagnosis and personalized treatment. This study evaluates the performance of Random Forest (RF) and Logistic Regression (LR) models in forecasting the major risk factors associated with severe PD progression. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 378 PD patients (aged 40-75 years) with at 2 years of follow-up. The dataset included patient demographics, clinical features, medication history, comorbidities, and environmental exposures. The data were randomly split into a training group (70%) and a validation group (30%). Both the RF and LR models were trained on the training set, and performance was assessed through accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) derived from ROC analysis. Results: Both models identified similar risk factors for severe PD progression, including older age, tremor-dominant motor subtype, long-term levodopa use, comorbid depression, and occupational pesticide exposure. The RF model outperformed the LR model, achieving an AUC of 0.85, accuracy of 82%, sensitivity of 79%, and specificity of 85%. In comparison, the LR model had an AUC of 0.78, accuracy of 76%, sensitivity of 74%, and specificity of 79%. ROC analysis showed that while both models could distinguish between slow and rapid disease progression, the RF model had stronger discriminatory power, particularly for identifying high-risk patients. Conclusion: The RF model provides better predictive accuracy and discriminatory power compared to Logistic Regression in identifying risk factors for severe PD progression. This study highlights the potential of machine learning techniques like Random Forest for early risk stratification and personalized management of PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.