ArticleBMJ public health2025
Quality of life and its determinants in women with delayed conception in low-mid socioeconomic neighbourhoods of Northern India: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and determinants of fertility care-seeking among women experiencing delayed conception in North India: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The inability to conceive or delay in conception has negative and multidimensional effects on health and well-being, daily functioning and societal interactions. This study assesses the impact of delayed conception on quality of life (QoL) among Indian women with delayed conception and evaluates the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) questionnaire's reliability and construct validity in this population. Methodology: A cross-sectional study of 1530 women aged 18-30, who had not conceived over a period of 18 months, was conducted in low-to-mid-socioeconomic neighbourhoods in Delhi, India. The 24-item core module of the FertiQoL questionnaire was used to assess participants' QoL. Researchers analysed data to identify factors associated with QoL scores and evaluated FertiQoL's internal consistency and validity. Data were collected between July 2020 and August 2021. Result: The average FertiQoL score was 31.71 out of 100, indicating a moderately low QoL. Among the subscales, emotional (mean: 29.0) and mind-body domains (mean: 25.4) scored the lowest, while the relational domain scored the highest (mean: 50.7). Factors negatively associated with QoL included a longer duration of delayed conception (β=-0.3, 95% CI: -0.5 to -0.1), husbands fathering children with other partners (β=-1.1, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.38), domestic violence-emotional (β=-3.5, 95% CI: -4.5 to -2.4), verbal (β=-3.2, 95% CI: -4.7 to -1.7), physical abuse by family (β=-3.6, 95% CI: -5.5 to -1.6), lack of financial support (β=-3.2, 95% CI: -5.2 to -1.2), social pressures (β=-1.6, 95% CI: -2.3 to -0.9) and physical health issues (β=-0.9, 95% CI: -1.7 to -0.2). The FertiQoL tool demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.64) and good construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis), confirming its utility in this population. Conclusion: Indian women experiencing delayed conception have reduced QoL, particularly in emotional and mind-body domains, due to various psychosocial and socioeconomic challenges. The FertiQoL questionnaire proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing QoL in this context. Psychosocial interventions addressing emotional, social and economic stressors are urgently needed to improve their well-being. Future research should include men to better understand the holistic challenges faced by couples struggling to conceive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.