ArticleBMJ public health2025
Mixed-method longitudinal investigation of sexual and gender-based violence following COVID-19 in South Africa.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns were raised about unintended effects of measures taken to prevent its spread, on sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). The United Nations called for understanding how national lockdowns put young people at risk of SGBV. This research is particularly needed in contexts such as South Africa, where pre-existing levels of SGBV are high and limited data has been released. Methods: This mixed-method longitudinal study characterised trajectories of household-level and partner-level SGBV exposure over 6 months, approximately 1 year after the initial COVID-19 lockdown. Utilising group-based trajectory modelling, survey data from 535 male and female participants, ages 13-24 and qualitative insights from 20 in-depth interviews were analysed. Results: Two trajectory groups emerged for both household-level and partner-level SGBV: (1) groups of participants with consistently low SGBV levels (household: 77.5%; partner: 89.4%) and (2) groups with high baseline levels of SGBV, followed by decreases to moderate levels (household: 22.5%; partner: 10.8%). Characteristics significantly associated with the latter groups included being female, not employed or in school, food insecurity and symptoms of probable common mental disorders. Qualitative data supported these findings and revealed the mitigating role of positive household communication skills, along with potentially unmeasured levels of technology-facilitated partner violence, occurring over phones and social media during lockdown. Conclusions: Findings should inform the targeting of financial, food and mental health support to those at higher risk of ongoing violence during future times of crises. Further research on technology-facilitated violence should be conducted to better understand its prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.