Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Yang Hu, Liu-Yang Yang, Meng-Yuan Lei, Yi-Xin Yang, Zhuo Sun, Wan Wang, Zhong-Ming Han, Lin Cheng, Ze-Liang Lv, Mei Han and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ecological effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yang Hu *Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Liu-Yang Yang *Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Meng-Yuan LeiCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Yi-Xin YangCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Zhuo SunCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Wan WangChangchun Medical College, Changchun, China.
Zhong-Ming HanCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Lin ChengCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Ze-Liang LvCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Mei HanCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Li-Min YangCultivation Base of State Key Laboratory for Ecological Restoration and Ecosystem Management of Jilin Province, College of Chinese Medicinal Materials, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The endophytic microbiome serves a crucial function as a secondary line of defense against pathogen invasion in plants. This study aimed to clarify the mechanism of action of the ginseng plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Methods: Ginseng root samples from a susceptible group (CK) with a disease level of 0-2 and a biocontrol group (BIO) treated with strain SZ-4 were collected. We employed high-throughput sequencing to examine the microbial community structure of ginseng roots at different disease levels, explore beneficial endophytic bacteria, and evaluate the efficacy of strain SZ-4 in mitigating root rot through synergistic interactions with ginseng endophytic flora. Results: The application of the PGPR Discussion: These findings offers a theoretical foundation for studying the microecological prevention and control of ginseng diseases as well as new insights for conducting research on the efficient and precise management of plant diseases.

Indexed as

Bacillus vallismortisBacillus velezensisbiocontrol straincommunity structureendophytic floraginsengroot rot

Identifiers

PMID40260086
PMCPMC12009907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.