Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40260042›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Nursing Students' Perspectives on Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Clinical Practice and Training: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Moustaq Karim Khan Rony, Sumon Ahmad, Dipak Chandra Das, Sabren Mukta Tanha, Tuli Rani Deb, Mosammat Ruma Akter, Mst Amena Khatun, Md Ibrahim Khalil, Umme Rabeya Peu, Mst Rina Parvin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AI-Based Learning Experiences of Nursing Students: A Qualitative Study.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Moustaq Karim Khan RonyMiyan Research Institute International University of Business Agriculture and Technology Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-0554
Sumon AhmadLeading University Sylhet Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6434-9684
Dipak Chandra DasShanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0566-8822
Sabren Mukta TanhaLeading University Sylhet Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5805-9642
Tuli Rani DebNursing Service Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka Bangladesh.
Mosammat Ruma AkterNational Institute of Advanced Nursing Education and Research Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0005-2602-4304
Mst Amena KhatunPundra University Science and Technology Bogura Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7323-0579
Md Ibrahim KhalilInstitute of Social Welfare and Research University of Dhaka Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7882-5538
Umme Rabeya PeuChattogram Imperial College of Nursing Chattogram Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6160-552X
Mst Rina ParvinBangladesh Army (AFNS Officer), Combined Military Hospital Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0111-6163
Daifallah M AlrazeeniDepartment Prince Sultan Bin Abdul Aziz College for Emergency Medical Services King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Fazila AkterDepartment of Health and Functioning Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5887-8370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has introduced transformative tools to enhance clinical decision-making and streamline workflows. In nursing, a profession characterized by human-centric care, AI adoption offers both significant opportunities and notable challenges. However, the perspectives of nursing students, future professionals, on integrating AI into clinical practice and education remain underexplored. Aim: This study aimed to explore nursing students' perceptions of incorporating AI into their clinical training and professional practice, with a focus on identifying benefits, challenges, and potential areas for improvement. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design explored the experiences and attitudes of 25 nursing students from five colleges in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diverse educational and clinical backgrounds. Semi-structured interviews in Bangla, lasting 40-50 min, were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Data were collected from May 8, 2024 to August 10, 2024. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes. Credibility was ensured through member checking, dependability via an audit trail, and confirmability through peer debriefing. Data visualization tools were used to map thematic relationships effectively. Results: Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: (1) AI integration in nursing education, (2) ethical and professional concerns, (3) preparedness for AI-driven practice, and (4) AI's impact on nursing practice. Participants expressed both optimism about AI's potential to improve accuracy and efficiency and apprehension about their readiness to use AI effectively in practice. Conclusion: The findings underscore the need for comprehensive curriculum reforms that incorporate AI training, address ethical concerns, and emphasize the role of AI as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for human expertise. These insights provide a roadmap for integrating AI into nursing education while preserving the compassionate core of nursing practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical practiceethical considerationshealthcare technologynursing educationstudent perspectives

Identifiers

PMID40260042
PMCPMC12010564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.