Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259988›Full record

ArticleISME communications2025

Insights into the biotic factors driving the outcome of coalescence events between soil bacterial communities.

Sarah Huet, Sana Romdhane, Marie-Christine Breuil, David Bru, Arnaud Mounier, Laurent Philippot, Ayme Spor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The fungal pathogenISME communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah HuetUniversity Bourgogne, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology,  17 rue de Sully, Dijon 21000, France.
Sana RomdhaneUniversity Bourgogne, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology,  17 rue de Sully, Dijon 21000, France.
Marie-Christine BreuilUniversity Bourgogne, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology,  17 rue de Sully, Dijon 21000, France.
David BruUniversity Bourgogne, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology,  17 rue de Sully, Dijon 21000, France.
Arnaud MounierUniversity Bourgogne, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology,  17 rue de Sully, Dijon 21000, France.
Laurent PhilippotUniversity Bourgogne, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology,  17 rue de Sully, Dijon 21000, France.
Ayme SporUniversity Bourgogne, INRAE, Institut Agro Dijon, Department of Agroecology,  17 rue de Sully, Dijon 21000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coalescence events, which consist in the mixing of previously separated communities, are frequent in nature or as a result of human activities. Despite recently gaining attention as a tool to test ecological theories and engineer microbial communities, little is known about the factors that influence the outcome of such coalescence events. Here, we evaluated the relative importance of three community properties-namely, diversity, composition, and density-in determining coalescence outcome and biotic interactions among members of the coalescing bacterial communities. We found that manipulation of the density and composition of soil bacterial community resulted in the largest shifts in the structure of the resulting coalesced communities, explaining 24.7% and 6.8% of the variance in the β-diversity of the coalesced communities, respectively. Coalescence events impacted up to 35% of the dominant Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTUs) in the native community, with a predominance of negative effects. Our results also revealed that community density had the greatest explanatory power for the variance in the relative abundance of the OTUs negatively affected by coalescence events. In particular, all significantly affected OTUs that belonged to the Bacillales exhibited a decrease in relative abundance in several of the coalesced communities, which was related to the density of some members of the α-Proteobacteria and γ-Proteobacteria in the manipulated community suspensions. Overall, our data suggest that community density and composition were the main properties determining the outcome of coalescence events and that coalescence experiments can offer insights into multi-species interactions in complex environments.

Indexed as

coalescencedensity-dependent interactionsmicrobial interactionssoil bacterial communitytop–down manipulation

Identifiers

PMID40259988
PMCPMC12011082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.