Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259973›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Loneliness among dementia caregivers: evaluation of the psychometric properties and cutoff score of the Three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale.

Amira Mohammed Ali, Saeed A Al-Dossary, Carlos Laranjeira, Abeer Selim, Souheil Hallit, Abdulmajeed A Alkhamees, Aljawharah Fahad Aljubilah, Musheer A Aljaberi, Ebtesam Abdullah Alzeiby, Annamaria Pakai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amira Mohammed AliDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health, Faculty of Nursing, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Saeed A Al-DossaryDepartment of Psychology, College of Education, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
Carlos LaranjeiraSchool of Health Sciences, Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Abeer SelimFaculty of Nursing, Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Souheil HallitSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon.
Abdulmajeed A AlkhameesDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Aljawharah Fahad AljubilahDepartment of Psychology, College of Education and Human Development, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Musheer A AljaberiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Nursing Science, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ebtesam Abdullah AlzeibyDepartment of Psychology, College of Education and Human Development, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Annamaria PakaiInstitute of Nursing Sciences, Basic Health Sciences and Health Visiting, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Haitham KhatatbehFaculty of Nursing, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dementia is a chronic progressive syndrome, with an entire loss of function in the late stages. The care of this demanding condition is primarily provided by family members, who often suffer from chronic burnout, distress, and loneliness. This instrumental study aimed to examine the factor structure, reliability, convergent validity, criterion validity, and cutoff scores of a short loneliness measure: the Three-Item version of the University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale (UCLALS3) in a convenience sample of dementia family caregivers (N = 571, mean age = 53 ±12 years, 81.6% females). Methods: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the structure of the UCLALS3 while receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, including caregiving burden and emotional distress as outcomes, was used to examine its cutoff. Results: One factor accounted for 79.0% of the variance in the UCLALS3; it was perfectly invariant across genders but variant at the metric level across countries. The scale had adequate internal consistency (alpha = 0.87), high item-total correlations (0.69 - 0.79), reduced alpha if item deleted (0.77 - 0.86), and strong positive correlations with caregiving burden and psychological distress scores (r = 0.57 & 0.74, p values = 0.01). Percentile scores and the ROC curve suggested two cutoffs (≥6 and ≥6.5), which classified 59.3 and 59.4% of the participants as having higher levels of loneliness-comparable to global levels of loneliness among informal caregivers. The Mann-Whitney test revealed significantly high levels of caregiving burden and distress in caregivers scoring ≥6.5 on the UCLALS3. Conclusion: The UCLALS3 is a valid short scale; its cutoff ≥6.5 may flag major clinically relevant symptoms in dementia caregivers, highlighting the need for tailored interventions that boost caregivers' individual perception of social relationships. More investigations are needed to confirm UCLALS3 invariance across countries.

Indexed as

caregiving burden/burnout/the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)cutoff score/receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysisfactor structure/psychometricinformal/family caregiversolder adults/old age/elders/elderlypsychological distress/depression anxiety stress scale 8-itemsThree-item version of the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLALS3)/loneliness

Identifiers

PMID40259973
PMCPMC12010107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.