Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259938›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2025

Simulation Study on the Dynamics of Cavitation Bubbles in Multi-Frequency Ultrasound.

Hu Dong, Gang Liu, Gaofeng Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hu DongSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Changsha Normal University, Changsha 410100, China.
Gang LiuSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Xinyu University, Xinyu, 338004, China.
Gaofeng PengSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Changsha Normal University, Changsha 410100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy is an effective minimally invasive treatment technique. Objective: This work aimed to present a theoretical foundation for transient cavitation control in HIFU treatment and investigate cavitation bubbles in multi-frequency ultrasound. Material and Methods: In this theoretical study, the nonlinear vibrations of bubbles in different mediums (water, urine, kidney, and muscle) were simulated using Gilmore-Akulichev and modified Keller-Miksis equations. The dynamic changes of bubble radius during irradiation by multi-frequency combined ultrasound were analyzed, and the effects of multi-frequency ultrasound combinations and frequency differences on the maximum and minimum values of bubble expansion radius and bubble collapse time were investigated. Results: At the same highest frequency, the triple-frequency produced the largest bubble expansion radius (R Conclusion: There was a strong correlation between the frequency difference and the multi-frequency ultrasound combination and the maximum and minimum values of the cavitation bubble radius and the collapse time.

Indexed as

CavitationCollapseDynamicHigh-Intensity Focused UltrasoundNonlinearRadiusTransientUltrasonicsViscosity

Identifiers

PMID40259938
PMCPMC12009471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.