Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259900›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025

Radiation safety: knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceived socioeconomic impact in a limited-resource radiotherapy setting.

Kofi Adesi Kyei, Hannah Boateng Addo, Joseph Daniels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How many cases to proficiency? A systematic review of the learning curve in endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kofi Adesi KyeiNational Radiotherapy, Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Box KB 369, Accra, Ghana.
Hannah Boateng AddoNational Radiotherapy, Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Box KB 369, Accra, Ghana.
Joseph DanielsNational Radiotherapy, Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Box KB 369, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers in teaching-hospital settings face numerous occupational hazards, necessitating comprehensive safety protocols to protect both staff and patients. Radiation safety is particularly critical in regions like sub-Saharan Africa, where the sharp rise in radiological procedures and radiation treatments demands stringent protocols to mitigate health risks. The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to radiation safety among healthcare workers in a limited-resource setting, as well as evaluate the perceived socioeconomic impact of implementing radiation safety protocols. The research was a quantitative case study of one of the largest radiotherapy centres in Africa. Participants were selected using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected using a modified structured questionnaire based on the validated International Atomic Energy Agency radiation safety knowledge, attitudes and practice questionnaire. Data were analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed. Data were summarized using frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations. The study involved 78 participants, comprising 13 physicians, 40 nurses and 25 other health workers. In all, 53.8% were males, whereas 46.2% were females. The mean age was 24.9 years (SD 4.7) ranging from 23 to 47 years. A significant majority (82%) were knowledgeable about effective ways of reducing radiation exposure. All participants considered radiation safety extremely important, with 55% feeling extremely confident in their ability to practice radiation safety measures. The majority (92%) believed that radiation safety was a shared responsibility within the organization. Only 51% frequently checked radiation safety equipment. There was a strong consensus that these protocols positively affect healthcare worker well-being (a mean score of 4.49) and benefit patient care (a mean score of 4.45). Implementation of workplace safety protocols was perceived to improve worker well-being (B = 0.337 and

Indexed as

attitudes and practices’‘health knowledgelow-income populationsoccupational healthradiation protectionradiation safetyradiotherapyworkplace safety

Identifiers

PMID40259900
PMCPMC12010179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.