Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259860›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025

Comparison of severe aplastic anaemia and lower risk hypoplastic myelodysplastic neoplasms: Critical role of megakaryocyte count in distinguishing aplastic anaemia from myelodysplastic neoplasms.

Tomoya Maeda, Akira Matsuda, Junya Kanda, Hiroshi Kawabata, Takayuki Ishikawa, Kaoru Tohyama, Akira Kitanaka, Kayano Araseki, Kei Shimbo, Tomoko Hata and 16 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Tomoya MaedaDepartment of Hemato-oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-5991
Akira MatsudaDepartment of Hemato-oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Junya KandaDepartment of Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-3633
Hiroshi KawabataDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki IshikawaDepartment of Hematology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Kaoru TohyamaDepartment of Medical Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Akira KitanakaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Kayano ArasekiDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan.
Kei ShimboClinical Laboratory Center, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, Japan.
Tomoko HataDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takahiro SuzukiDepartment of Hematology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-2186
Hidekazu KayanoFaculty of Health and Medical Care, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan.
Kensuke UsukiFourth Department of Internal Medicine, Mizonokuchi Hospital, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Maki Shindo-UedaDepartment of Hematology, Japan Baptist Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Nobuyoshi ArimaDepartment of Hematology, Shinko Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Masaharu NohgawaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan.
Akiko OhtaDivision of Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Saitama Medical University Faculty of Medicine, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan.
Shigeru ChibaDepartment of Hematology and Division of Stem Cell Therapy, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7803-7338
Yasushi MiyazakiDepartment of Hematology, Atomic Bomb Disease and Hibakusha Medicine Unit, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3683-7147
Shinji NakaoJapanese Red Cross Ishikawa Blood Center, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9674-624X
Keiya OzawaDivision of Gene and Cell Therapy for Intractable Diseases, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Shunya AraiDepartment of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mineo KurokawaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akifumi Takaori-KondoDepartment of Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kinuko MitaniDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, Japan.
Japanese National Research Group on Idiopathic Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare JPMHLW20FC1018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although genetic abnormalities are increasingly crucial for diagnosing and classifying haematopoietic diseases, dysplasia remains crucial for distinguishing myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) from aplastic anaemia (AA). Erythroid dysplasia may be observed in AA, complicating the differentiation between these conditions. In a previous study using the data from the Japan Idiopathic Myelodysplastic Syndrome Study Group's registry, we found that erythroid dysplasia does not affect the prognosis of AA. This current study was designed to compare the prognosis of patients with lower risk hypoplastic MDS (LR-hMDS), as determined by our review, and patients with severe AA (SAA), all enrolled concurrently, to validate our diagnostic approach. Stringent criteria were used to rule out MDS, considering bone marrow cellularity and megakaryocyte counts, with a confirmed AA diagnosis only following a reduced megakaryocyte count. The study comprised 39 severe cases extracted from a cohort of 100 AA patients previously reported and 41 patients with LR-hMDS. Significant differences in overall and leukaemia-free survival were observed between the two groups (p < 0.0001). Even among patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, a marked prognostic distinction became evident after 5 years, although their response to the therapy did not differ significantly. Therefore, the megakaryocyte count is pivotal in differentiating MDS from AA.

Indexed as

Anemia, AplasticMegakaryocytesMyelodysplastic SyndromesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisYoung Adultaplastic anaemiahypoplastic MDSmegakaryocyte countmyelodysplastic neoplasmssurvival

Identifiers

PMID40259860
PMCPMC12166340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.