ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Comparison of severe aplastic anaemia and lower risk hypoplastic myelodysplastic neoplasms: Critical role of megakaryocyte count in distinguishing aplastic anaemia from myelodysplastic neoplasms.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although genetic abnormalities are increasingly crucial for diagnosing and classifying haematopoietic diseases, dysplasia remains crucial for distinguishing myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) from aplastic anaemia (AA). Erythroid dysplasia may be observed in AA, complicating the differentiation between these conditions. In a previous study using the data from the Japan Idiopathic Myelodysplastic Syndrome Study Group's registry, we found that erythroid dysplasia does not affect the prognosis of AA. This current study was designed to compare the prognosis of patients with lower risk hypoplastic MDS (LR-hMDS), as determined by our review, and patients with severe AA (SAA), all enrolled concurrently, to validate our diagnostic approach. Stringent criteria were used to rule out MDS, considering bone marrow cellularity and megakaryocyte counts, with a confirmed AA diagnosis only following a reduced megakaryocyte count. The study comprised 39 severe cases extracted from a cohort of 100 AA patients previously reported and 41 patients with LR-hMDS. Significant differences in overall and leukaemia-free survival were observed between the two groups (p < 0.0001). Even among patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, a marked prognostic distinction became evident after 5 years, although their response to the therapy did not differ significantly. Therefore, the megakaryocyte count is pivotal in differentiating MDS from AA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.