ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2025
Physician-Scientist Training System and Development Strategies in Korea.
Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Participation During a National Educational Disruption: Insights From a Natural Experiment in Medical Education.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Salary and Support Continuity Influence Medical Students' Intentions to Pursue Physician-Scientist Careers: Results of an Experimental Survey.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Quantitative Changes in the Number of Basic Medicine Faculty at Medical Schools in Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- It Is Time for Physician-Scientists to Lead Their Own Development.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Reviving Medical Research in Korea After Impeachment of the President: A Roadmap to Restoration.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physician-scientists play a pivotal role in bridging clinical practice and biomedical research, advancing medical science, and tackling complex healthcare challenges. In South Korea, the declining number of medical doctors engaging in basic medical sciences has prompted the implementation of various training initiatives since the 2000s. Notable initiatives, such as the Integrated Physician-Scientist Training Program (2019) and the Global Physician-Scientist Training Program (2024), aim to cultivate multidisciplinary physician-scientists capable of addressing unmet medical needs. This study offers a comprehensive overview of the current training systems, funding mechanisms, and strategic approaches for physician-scientists in South Korea, compares them with international best practices, and proposes actionable policy recommendations to enhance their effectiveness and long-term sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.