ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025
Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative Knee Joint Mapping With MR Fingerprinting and Its Comparison to Dictionary Matching Method: Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Model for Quantitative MRF.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), as an emerging versatile and noninvasive imaging technique, provides simultaneous quantification of multiple quantitative MRI parameters, which have been used to detect changes in cartilage composition and structure in osteoarthritis. Deep learning (DL)-based methods for quantification mapping in MRF overcome the memory constraints and offer faster processing compared to the conventional dictionary matching (DM) method. However, limited attention has been given to the fine-tuning of neural networks (NNs) in DL and fair comparison with DM. In this study, we investigate the impact of training parameter choices on NN performance and compare the fine-tuned NN with DM for multiparametric mapping in MRF. Our approach includes optimizing NN hyperparameters, analyzing the singular value decomposition (SVD) components of MRF data, and optimization of the DM method. We conducted experiments on synthetic data, the NIST/ISMRM MRI system phantom with ground truth, and in vivo knee data from 14 healthy volunteers. The results demonstrate the critical importance of selecting appropriate training parameters, as these significantly affect NN performance. The findings also show that NNs improve the accuracy and robustness of T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.