ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
Exploring the landscape of palliative care provision for black patients with hematologic cancers: A scoping review.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Actionable Steps to Address Disparities in Healthcare Among US Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Patient Perspective.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients with cancer benefit greatly from receiving palliative care (PC), improving their overall survival and quality of life. Despite its benefits, PC is underutilized among patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs), particularly among Black patients, who face higher symptom burdens and lower survival rates compared to White patients. The purpose of this review was to identify and describe what is known about PC use among Black HM patients in the United States.
methodsThis review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach for scoping reviews and included a search of the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus and Web of Science (Clarivate). The search was developed and conducted by a professional medical librarian in consultation with the author team and focused on keywords such as Black/African American patients, HM, and PC. Articles were screened and selected based on predefined inclusion criteria and carried out using Covidence software for systematic review management.
resultsSeven publications were included in the final sample and most used quantitative methods and data from large national databases such as the National Cancer Database. Four of the studies reported that Black patients with HM were less likely to receive or use PC compared to White patients. Access to PC was associated with better outcomes, such as lower hospital charges and a reduced likelihood of dying within 30 days of initiating palliative radiotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE
resultsThis scoping review highlights ongoing inequities in the use of PC among Black patients with HM which mirrors trends in patients with solid cancers. Future studies should be conducted to understand the determinants of these disparities and to also build testable interventions to improve PC use within this underserved population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.