ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025
The Socio-Ecological Enablers of Smoking and Vaping in Rural Young Adults: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTobacco and vaping use among young people is a significant public health issue in Australia. Smoking rates are higher in rural areas of Australia compared to metropolitan cities. Research is needed to understand the factors that influence rural people to experiment and commence use of these products to inform evidence-based prevention and to reduce dependence and related morbidity and mortality. The study aim was to analyse the socio-ecological enablers of smoking tobacco and vaping use in young adults (18-30 years of age) in a rural Australian context with high rates of population tobacco use and to identify factors to improve prioritisation, design and implementation of place-based prevention interventions.
methodsThe study setting was defined by three adjoining rural shires (all modified Monash 5 small rural towns) in [deidentified for peer review] Victoria, Australia. A mixed-methods approach was applied using an online quantitative descriptive survey (n = 51) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 7) with young adults, and semi-structured interviews with health professionals (n = 10) working in the region. Quantitative and qualitative descriptive analyses were completed to describe the influences on smoking and vaping uptake and continued use, and recommendations for prevention-focused population health intervention.
resultsFriends were the highest influence on smoking tobacco and vaping uptake and continued use for the survey participants. The next highest known influences on smoking tobacco and vaping uptake were classmates and sporting teammates, and the interrelationships with stress and mental health were also emphasised. The interview themes are presented in the socio-ecological frames and highlight how cultural change and policy and legislation interventions might prevent uptake.
conclusionsThe findings inform place-based prevention strategies for governments and community health organisations in similar rural contexts; further population survey research is needed in this area for more accurate data to inform rural population health planning. SO WHAT?: Rural young adults smoking and vaping was most strongly influenced by friends. Prevention is needed that focuses on peer-to-peer health promotion in schools, sports clubs and workplaces, and which considers interrelationships with mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.