ArticleAsian spine journal2025
Effectiveness of intradiscal steroid injection for spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study in South Korea.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Comprehensive and Integrative Medical Services on Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Letter to editor: Intradiscal steroid injection for lumbar canal stenosis: novel but not yet ready for clinical adoption.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Response to the letter to the editor: Effectiveness of intradiscal steroid injection for spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study in South Korea.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designA retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intradiscal steroid injection (ISI) in managing patients with spinal stenosis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: ISI has shown effectiveness in relieving lower back pain in patients with degenerative disc disease. However, its potential utility in managing the symptoms of spinal stenosis remains unexplored.
methodsThis study included 260 patients with spinal stenosis who complained of lower back pain and radiating pain in the lower extremities. During the ISI, a mixture of 1 mL of dexamethasone 5 mg and 1 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% was administered. Pain levels were assessed at weeks 2 and 6 after ISI using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. Patients requiring surgery within a year because of persistent or worsening symptoms were analyzed, and pain score changes between the surgical and nonsurgical groups were compared.
resultsISI significantly reduced the initial back pain VAS score (8.85) and leg pain VAS score (8.91) at weeks 2 (back pain=4.58; p<0.001, leg pain=4.42; p<0.001) and 6 (back pain=4.79; p<0.001, leg pain=4.70; p<0.001). A total of 228 patients (87.7%) showed improvement of initial symptoms without the need for surgery 1 year after ISI. The surgical and nonsurgical groups showed improvement in leg and back pain VAS scores 2 weeks after ISI. However, in the surgical group, a significant trend was noted toward worsening back and leg pain VAS score at week 6 after ISI.
conclusionsISI effectively provided temporary pain relief for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The majority of patients, up to 1 year later, only necessitate conservative management of their symptoms and do not require surgery. In particular, if the improvement in pain persists up to 6 weeks after the ISI, surgical intervention may be delayed in favor of more conservative treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.