ArticleNursing & health sciences2025
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale in Older People Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty.
Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current self-efficacy scales for physical activity focus on moderate-to-vigorous exercise in healthy adults, leaving limited options for those engaged in light-to-moderate physical activity. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES-J) tailored for light-to-moderate-intensity activities and to assess its validity and reliability. Preoperative and postoperative patients undergoing lower-limb arthroplasty (113 participants) were evaluated using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) to establish criterion-related validity. The revised version of the Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-Enhancing Physical Activity, Oxford Hip Score, or Oxford Knee Score, and accelerometers were used to test the hypotheses. The ESES-J demonstrated strong internal consistency, good intraclass coefficient scores, and no systematic errors in the Bland-Altman analysis. The correlation with the GSES was moderate, confirming 80% of the hypotheses. The ESES-J demonstrated robust reliability and validity. Understanding self-efficacy among individuals with disabilities may lead to personalized health support to improve physical activity levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.