Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259532›Full record

Observational studyPediatric blood & cancer2025

Spiritual Communication Between Pediatric Oncologists, Caregivers, and Patients With Brain Tumors.

Alexandra K Superdock, Amy S Porter, Walter Spears, Justin N Baker, Jennifer W Mack, Erica C Kaye

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02846038 (Understanding Communication in Healthcare to Achieve Trust), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02846038 completednot on this map

Understanding Communication in Healthcare to Achieve Trust (U-CHAT): A Prospective Longitudinal Investigation of Communication Between Pediatric Oncologists, Children/Adolescents With High-Risk Cancer, and Their Families at the Stressful Time-Points of Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorSt. Jude Children's Research HospitalRan2016 to 2024Enrolled138ConditionsBrain Tumors, Solid Tumor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra K SuperdockDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-3511
Amy S PorterDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, Mass General for Children, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-0286
Walter SpearsMission Integration Division, Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Justin N BakerDivision of Quality of Life and Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Medicine Children's Health, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jennifer W MackDivision of Population Sciences' Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-4178
Erica C KayeDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6522-3876

Funding

IMPROVING PROGNOSTIC COMMUNICATION IN PEDIATRIC CANCERK08CA266935 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Erica Carmen Kaye · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
ALSACNCI NIH HHS K08 CA266935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpiritual care is recognized as an essential component of standard care for children with cancer and their families. Oncologists lack training in navigating spirituality discussions in primary cancer care. The current landscape of spiritual dialog during clinical oncology encounters remains understudied. PROCEDURES: This qualitative study described the frequency, context, and content of religious and spiritual communication between pediatric neuro-oncologists, caregivers, and patients with brain tumors during disease re-evaluation encounters. This study is part of the U-CHAT trial (NCT02846038), a prospective longitudinal investigation of real-time clinical communication across the trajectory of poor-prognosis cancer. Patients with brain tumors and their caregivers were eligible if their primary oncologist estimated ≤50% survival. All disease re-evaluation encounters for enrolled patients were audio-recorded and underwent rapid qualitative analysis to identify, summarize, and synthesize religious and spiritual communication.

resultsReligious or spiritual references were identified in 23 (18%) of 129 total encounters. References usually comprised a single religious or spiritual term, with "prayer"-related language representing the majority of references. Caregivers introduced spiritual dialog more often than oncologists (65% vs. 35%). References were most often identified in the context of a discussion about an uncertain or uncontrollable future.

conclusionsResults suggest oncologists rarely integrate spiritual care into disease re-evaluation discussions. In light of recommendations from multiple consensus groups to integrate spiritual care into cancer care, future work should explore how generalist spiritual care training could better equip oncologists to attend to spiritual needs that arise along the cancer trajectory.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCaregiversCommunicationOncologistsPhysician-Patient RelationsSpiritualityAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePrognosiscommunicationoncologypalliativepediatricsreligionspirituality

Identifiers

PMID40259532
PMCPMC12101940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.