Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259530›Full record

ReviewJournal of separation science2025

Are We Ready for It? A Review of Forensic Applications and Readiness for Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography in Routine Forensic Analysis.

Emma L Macturk, Kevin Hayes, Gwen O'Sullivan, Katelynn A Perrault Uptmor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma L MacturkChemistry Department, William & Mary, Nontargeted Separations Laboratory, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0204-2601
Kevin HayesEnvironmental Forensics and Arson Laboratory, Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada.
Gwen O'SullivanEnvironmental Forensics and Arson Laboratory, Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-1154
Katelynn A Perrault UptmorChemistry Department, William & Mary, Nontargeted Separations Laboratory, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0210-2687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) has been explored in forensic research to provide advanced chromatographic separation for forensic evidence, including illicit drugs, fingerprint residue, chemical, biological, nuclear, and radioactive (CBNR) substances, toxicological evidence, odor decomposition, and petroleum analysis for arson investigations and oil spill tracing. In GC×GC, the separation and analysis of analytes is similar to one-dimensional GC, but the primary column is connected to a secondary column via a modulator to provide two independent separation mechanisms, thus increasing the peak capacity of the analysis. The goal of implementing GC×GC in forensic studies is often to increase the separation and detectability of analytes and has most often been applied in nontargeted forensic applications where a wide range of analytes must be analyzed simultaneously. To date, there has been no summary of the current state of forensic research that evaluates both analytical and legal readiness for routine use. For these analytical methods to be adopted into forensic laboratories and be used in evidence analysis, they must meet rigorous analytical standards. In addition, new analytical methods for evidence analysis must adhere to standards laid out by the legal system, including the Frye Standard, Daubert Standard, and Federal Rule of Evidence 702 in the United States and the Mohan Criteria in Canada. Current research on GC×GC use for forensic applications was summarized and reviewed for analytical advances and technology readiness to provide a comprehensive view of GC×GC use for future routine implementation. A technology readiness scale, with levels from 1 to 4, was used to characterize the advancement of research in each individual application area. Seven forensic chemistry applications are discussed related to courtroom criteria and categorized into technology readiness levels based on current literature as of 2024. Future directions for all applications should place a focus on increased intra- and inter-laboratory validation, error rate analysis, and standardization.

Indexed as

Forensic SciencesChromatography, GasHumans

Identifiers

PMID40259530
PMCPMC12012292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.