Observational studyClinical and translational science2025
Care Team Attributes Predict Likelihood of Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Information During Inpatient Prescribing.
Observational study in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03225820 (Implementation of Point-of-Care Pharmacogenomic Decision Support Accounting for Minority Disparities), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of Point-of-Care Pharmacogenomic Decision Support Accounting for Minority Disparities
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Results of the ACCOuNT Trial: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Pharmacogenomics Implementation Trial for African American Inpatients.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medication prescribing is imperfect, and unintended side effects complicate patient care. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is an emerging solution that associates genotypes with personalized drug-related outcomes, but it has not been widely adopted. We hypothesize that patient and provider attributes may predict and promote PGx utilization. We studied PGx using data from the ACCOuNT study, a multi-institutional prospective trial that implemented broad preemptive PGx result delivery for African American inpatients [Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03225820]. Patients were genotyped, and their PGx information was made available within an integrated informatics portal. Utilization of PGx data (defined as the active choice to review PGx information) was left to the enrolled provider's discretion. Our primary endpoint was to identify patient and care team attributes associated with PGx use. We identified statistically significant univariate predictors and utilized logistic regression to compare relative predictiveness. This study included 187 patients (60.4% female, median age 55, 75.4% treated at the University of Chicago, 17.6% at Northwestern University, and 7.0% at the University of Illinois Chicago) and 188 providers (63.8% MD, 22.3% PharmD, 6.4% PA, and 7.4% APN). In multivariate analysis, we found that the use of PGx information in a prior admission significantly predicted the use in subsequent admissions (OR 7.62, p < 0.05). Similarly, pharmacist participation on care teams significantly predicted PGx use (OR 4.52, p < 0.05). In the first systematic analysis of the impact of patient and care team factors on inpatient PGx clinical decision support (CDS) adoption, we found that actionable care team attributes, such as pharmacist participation or successful initial adoption measures, predict PGx CDS use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.