Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259499›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Relationship of tissue dimensions and stun placement on cadaver heads from 2- to 3-yr-old male bison (Bison bison).

Allison L Matzek, Emma M Hamilton, Ashlynn A Kirk, Denise L Perry, Kurt D Vogel, Karly N Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allison L MatzekDepartment of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin - River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA.
Emma M HamiltonDepartment of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin - River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7126-8038
Ashlynn A KirkDepartment of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin - River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1623-8959
Denise L PerryDepartment of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin - River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA.
Kurt D VogelDepartment of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin - River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8712-7298
Karly N AndersonDepartment of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin - River Falls, River Falls, WI 54022, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4997-997X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bison industry in the United States has been growing rapidly. In 2023, over 75,000 bison were commercially slaughtered, but stunning methods for bison did not appear to be scientifically evaluated at the time of our study. Our primary objective was to evaluate tissue thicknesses at the frontal (FRONTAL: 2.5 cm above a line connecting the bottom of the horns) and poll (POLL: below the crest of the head at the midline and angled toward the ventral aspect of the nose) placements in bison. The secondary objectives were to assess the potential for bolt-thalamus contact and determine an optimal stunning placement based on thalamic location. Fifteen cadaver heads from 2- to 3-yr-old bulls (hot carcass weights: 300.50 ± 27.42 kg; mean ± SD) with hide-on were obtained from a commercial slaughter establishment after being stunned with a 0.410-bore shotgun at a frontal location. All heads were shaved, and external head features were measured. A 0.25R-caliber Jarvis free-flight penetrating captive bolt (PCB) was applied at the POLL placement. Heads were split at the midline and soft tissue and cranial thicknesses were measured with a digital caliper. Digital images were obtained of the split head to evaluate the brain and thalamic contact plane. From these images, an IDEAL placement was determined to ensure bolt-thalamic contact. The IDEAL placement is in a significantly different (P < 0.0001) location than the FRONTAL placement and is located 8.33 ± 0.36 cm above the base of the horns at the midline with the shot placed perpendicular to the surface of the head. For the IDEAL placement, the bolt path was in the plane of the thalamus for 14/14 heads (100.00%, 95% CI: 76.8% to 100.0%) while only in the plane of the thalamus at the FRONTAL placement for 11/14 heads (78.57%, 95% CI: 49.2% to 95.3%) and at the POLL placement for 10/14 heads (71.43%, 95% CI: 42.0% to 91.6%). Total tissue thickness was significantly greater (P < 0.0008) at the FRONTAL placement (75.00 ± 1.84 mm; upper reference limit (URL): 89.31 mm) than the IDEAL (60.92 ± 1.90 mm; URL: 70.64 mm) and POLL (64.60 ± 1.84 mm; URL: 85.52 mm) placements. There was no evidence to support a difference (P = 0.5166) in total tissue thicknesses between the IDEAL and POLL placements. Thalamic depth at the IDEAL placement was 115.27 ± 8.36 mm (URL: 133.96 mm). Therefore, to reach the thalamus consistently and cause insensibility, it is recommended to stun at the IDEAL placement and have a penetration depth of at least 133.96 mm for PCB use in young male bison.

Indexed as

BisonHeadAbattoirsAnimalsCadaverMalebisoncaptive bolteuthanasiastunningwelfare

Identifiers

PMID40259499
PMCPMC12408989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.