ReviewJBJS reviews2025
Myths and Facts About Allograft Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Detailed Review of the Literature.
Review in JBJS reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The "McFL-LARS" Hybrid Technique: Fascia Lata Autograft and Synthetic Reinforcement for Combined Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Biomechanical Considerations of Graft Selection-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Drivers of Labor and Supply Cost Variation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2026Article
- Acromioclavicular joint stabilization using autologous biceps for horizontal neutralization technique in the revision setting of acromioclavicular joint stabilization using autologous biceps.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction Using Allografts as the ACL Graft Source Reduces Surgical Failure and Improves Graft Maturity Compared with Isolated ACL Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization Using Autologous Biceps for Horizontal Neutralization (AutoBAHN) Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
» Patient-Specific Graft Selection: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) requires a nuanced approach that considers various patient-specific factors, such as age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgical goals. Generally, allografts are preferred for older patients with less active lifestyles, whereas autografts are more suitable for younger, active patients because of autografts' lower retear rates.» Impact of Sterilization Techniques: Sterilization and processing techniques significantly affect the biomechanical properties and outcomes of allografts. While high-dose irradiation reduces allograft strength and compromises healing, low-dose irradiation or nonirradiated grafts offer superior biomechanical and clinical outcomes. However, standardized sterilization protocols are yet to be established.» Comparative Outcomes of Allografts and Autografts: Evaluating the literature on allografts vs. autografts in ACLR remains challenging because of the significant variability in patient characteristics, outcome measures, graft strength testing, and sterilization techniques across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.