ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Psychosocial work determinants of older adults' participation in the job market: protocol for a scoping review of quantitative longitudinal studies.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-related differences in psychosocial risks among community mental health professionals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Work-active ageing or healthy worker selection? Late-life employment and happiness among older migrants in Europe.Journal of migration and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore than one-third of the population in developed countries is aged 50 and older (hereafter older adults), and this proportion has been increasing every year. Aging is associated with labor shortages which places a large socioeconomic stress on individuals, organizations, and governments. Evidence on the influences of psychosocial factors in older workers mostly focuses on adverse health outcomes and early retirement, with little or no evidence of their influences on other aspects or assessments of older adults' participation in the job market. In this work, we aim to describe existing quantitative longitudinal studies on the relationship between psychosocial work factors and older adult's participation in the job market, and to explore how the outcome is operationalized in existing studies on this topic.
methodsThe scoping review frameworks developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and Levac and colleagues will guide this study. We will perform a comprehensive search for eligible publications in the followingdatabases: MEDLINE, AgeLine, CINAHL, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, ProQuest One Business, SOCindex, Abstracts in Social Gerontology, and Social Works Abstract. This work will focus on the job-demand-control-support, the effort-reward imbalance, the organizational justice, three renowned theretical models, while paying attention to other work risk factors measured in selected studies. Studies involving older adults of 50 years old or more and published in English or French will be considered, regardless of publication date. Abstracts, full-text screening, and data extraction will be performed independently by two trained reviewers using standard methodology. While sorting studies, we will complete a narrative synthesis of findings considering, when possible, sex and gender. DISCUSSION: While rigorous reviews are increasingly being recommended for decision-making in organizational and political guidelines, providing an overview of psychosocial work factors associated with older adult's participation in the job market is a crucial start point. This scoping review will contribute to the understanding of how to define and assess participation in the job market and its work-related determinants in older adults. Our findings may also help to prioritize if and what future systematic reviews on this topic should focus on. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Submitted in Open Science Framework on 07-10-2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.