Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259395›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical case reports2025

Dawson's finger radiological presentation of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in a young female: a case report and review of the literature.

Hadeel Al-Husban, Stavroula L Kastora, Olusegun Oduyoye

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hadeel Al-HusbanGeneral Medicine, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Rd, Luton, LU4 0DZ, UK.
Stavroula L KastoraUniversity College London, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, Medical School Building, 74 Huntley Street, London, UK. s.kastora@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-5267
Olusegun OduyoyeMedical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen School of Medicine, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the UK is among the highest in the world with prevalence in the north of Scotland presenting the peak of cases. Pathologically multiple sclerosis is regarded as multifocal areas of demyelination resulting in a spectrum of clinical manifestations, which pose diagnostic challenges. Dawson fingers are periventricular hyperintensities that that display high specificity for multiple sclerosis over all other demyelinating conditions. Intriguingly, they are also seen in cerebral small vessel diseasespectrum maladies. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report we explore the presentation of Dawson finger hyperintensities in the primary diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of a 26 year old white caucasian female with right-sided dysesthesia as the presenting complaint of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

conclusionWe further assess the sensitivity and specificity of Dawsons fingers upon multiple sclerosis diagnosis as well as their implications in differentiation between a family of demyelinating conditions with similar presentations. Lastly, we highlight the interplay between vascular and neuronal integrity in multiple sclerosis progression as highlighted by imaging and biochemical pathophysiology.

Indexed as

FingersMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingParesthesiaAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingDawson fingersDemyelinationMSMultiple sclerosisSensory

Identifiers

PMID40259395
PMCPMC12010641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.