ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Winning determinants between top and second division in Chinese professional football leagues: an interpretable machine learning approach.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of winning determinants in two professional soccer leagues. The sample was composed of 1,440 Chinese Super Football League (CSL) and Chinese Football Association China League (CFACL) matches (CSL matches = 720; CFACL matches = 720) during the 2017-2019 seasons. The study employed eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to assess the importance of 25 indicators exhibiting significant differences (p < 0.05) in their association with match outcomes, and the SHapley Additive explanations (SHAP) was utilized to interpret these findings. The results showed that scoring performance indicators, such as Shots On Target Inside Box (SOTIB), Shots, and Shots On Target (SOT), significantly influenced outcomes in both the CSL ([Formula: see text]=37.854%) and CFACL ([Formula: see text]=38.934%), with SOTIB being the most impactful. Additionally, this study found that defensive feature clearances were highly influential in both leagues, ranking second only to SOTIB of variable importance. Meanwhile, defensive feature fouls were a more significant factor in determining match outcomes in the CFACL than in the CSL. In both the CSL and CFACL, players must prioritize precision in shooting within the penalty area rather than merely increasing the frequency of shots. For CFACL teams, if consistent high-quality passing is unattainable, effective use of set pieces (e.g., free kicks) could serve as an alternative strategy to organize attacks. These findings can assist coaches in formulating tailored tactical strategies suited to the distinct demands of each league level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.