Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259366›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Perceptions of virtual clinical learning in dentistry: Understanding student views on virtual dental clinics.

Kiran Rehman, Omer Sheriff Sultan, Muneer Gohar Babar, Fareeza Marican, Syed Sarosh Mahdi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiran RehmanDivision of Restorative Dentistry, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Omer Sheriff SultanDivision of Restorative Dentistry, Missouri School of Dentistry and Oral Health, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, USA.
Muneer Gohar BabarDivision of Clinical Oral Health Sciences, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Fareeza MaricanINCEIF University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Syed Sarosh MahdiDivision of Clinical Oral Health Sciences, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. syedsarosh@imu.edu.my.

Funding

IMU JC (4.3/JCM-274/2023) and
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Virtual Dental Clinics (VDCs) are designed in an interactive mode for undergraduate dental students to expose them to dental clinical cases in the form of didactic learning rather than experiential learning. VDCs simulate realistic dental practice scenarios within a virtual environment, providing students with opportunities to engage in clinical decision-making, patient interactions, and procedural simulations.

aimThis study aims to assess students' perceptions regarding the usefulness of Virtual Dental Clinics (VDCs) in simulated clinical training using a validated questionnaire. The study seeks to assess student perceptions on usefulness, satisfaction, ease of learning and ease of use of Virtual Dental Clinics as a clinical teaching and learning tool. METHODOLOGY: The Virtual Dental Clinics were designed on themes from sub-specialities of dentistry. Themes for clinical case scenarios were selected and designed with the guidance of specialist faculty and the E-Learn department of International Medical University. "A total of 29 Year 3 dental students participated in the study after using the VDC for two weeks. Year 3 dental students were included, as they recently began clinical postings, lacking exposure to advanced clinical situations. A pre-piloted and validated questionnaire named the 'USE questionnaire' was utilized to assess student perceptions regarding the usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, and satisfaction with VDCs."

resultsData analysis showed that students expressed significantly different opinions regarding the domains Usefulness & Ease of Learning (mean difference 0.48, p < 0.001) as well as Usefulness and Satisfaction (mean difference 0.43, p < 0.001). The significant results for the usefulness domains suggest that although the tool is effective in helping the user achieve their task, there is still room for improvement in making it more user-friendly and easier to learn as well as in overall user satisfaction. Our study evaluated the impact of Virtual Dental Clinics (VDCs) on student perceptions. Data analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction and found significant differences between 'Uselessness' and other domains, which demonstrated the perceived utility of VDCs as an educational tool in the clinical setting. Importantly, uselessness was rated significantly higher compared to 'Ease of use (p < 0.001), 'Ease of learning' p < 0.001) and satisfaction (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between 'Ease of use, ease of learning and satisfaction' (p > 0.05). The results demonstrate VDCs efficacy in supporting educational needs of students. These findings suggest that while users perceived the tool as effective in task completion (usefulness), further improvements may be required to improve its ease of use, learnability, and overall satisfaction. The lack of significant differences among the latter three domains may indicate a comparable user experience in those aspects.

conclusionThis study has provided an understanding of student perception across the various aspects of usefulness, satisfaction, ease of use, and ease of learning in virtual dental clinics. The significant differences between some domains highlight variability in end-user experience, providing rationale for future improvements and optimization of end-user experience.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDental ClinicsEducation, DentalStudents, DentalVirtual RealityFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical SimulationDental EducationE-Learning in DentistryVirtual Dental ClinicVirtual Dental Education

Identifiers

PMID40259366
PMCPMC12013056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.