ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
Transitional and CD21
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting B-cell targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: from paradoxical biology to deep immune reset.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly initiation of effective treatment is associated with positive long-term prognosis for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Currently, there are no biomarkers in clinical use to predict treatment response. A predictor of treatment response may be the B-cell compartment, as this is altered in RA patients, making it a potential candidate for predicting treatment response. In this study, we sought to identify B-cell subset(s) at diagnosis that might be associated with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at 24-week follow-up.
methodsSeventy early RA patients from the NORD-STAR trial, recruited from two Swedish sites, and 28 matched healthy controls, were included in this spin-off study. In NORD-STAR, all patients were randomized to methotrexate (MTX) combined with 1) prednisolone, 2) anti-TNF (certolizumab-pegol), 3) CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), or 4) anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab). Circulating B-cell subsets at diagnosis were assessed by flow cytometry. The primary outcome measure was remission according to CDAI ≤ 2.8. A multivariate two-part discriminant analysis was performed to assess whether B-cell subpopulations at diagnosis could predict remission at 24 weeks. Subsequent univariable statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U, or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as appropriate. Correlations were analyzed using Spearman or Pearson tests, depending on data type. The impact of specific B-cell populations on remission at week 24 was assessed using logistic regression models. The logistic regression model was also used to simultaneously visualize the sensitivity and specificity of the model for all possible values of the exposure (B-cell subpopulations) in predicting the outcome.
resultsPatients who achieved CDAI remission at 24 weeks had higher proportions of transitional (p < 0.01) and CD21
conclusionsOur results indicate that transitional and CD21 CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.