ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Comparative chemical and antimicrobial evaluation of the essential oils from Callistemon and podocarpus species supported by in-silico molecular simulations against bacterial LacY protease.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyrtaceae and Podocarpaceae botanical families include several aromatic species that have been proven to have diverse pharmacological potential, especially antimicrobial effects. Additionally, plants of both families were reported for their benefits in traditional medicine. The current study demonstrated the chemical profile, antimicrobial of four investigated plant species (C. subulatus, C. rigidus, P. gracilior, and P. elongatus) leaves cultivated in the same place in Egypt and propose in-silico modeling for the antibacterial mechanistic action.
methodThe essential oils samples were prepared via hydrodistillation and headspace extraction protocol and GC analysis was conducted to obtain a comparative chemical profile. The antimicrobial activity of the obtained hydrodistillation essential oil samples was screened via agar diffusion, and the MIC was calculated via broth microdilution assays. An in silico molecular docking study was performed to investigate the inhibition of the LacY protease efflux pump.
resultsGC results revealed that the percentage of oxygenated monoterpenes was highest in the oil samples from Callistemon species (60.38 and 82.68%). In contrast, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons constituted the highest percentage of volatile classes in the oil samples from Podocarpus species (57.37 and 43.16%). C. rigidus-EO shows significant inhibitory activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens, especially E. coli and S. viridans, with a calculated MIC of 0.878 ml, whereas P. elongatus EO shows notable activity against coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and the activity was comparable to that of the positive control antibiotics used (ciprofloxacin & doxycycline). Ultimately, an in silico molecular docking study on the binding site of the LacY protease enzyme revealed a significant binding affinity of the major docked volatile constituents.
conclusionThe plant species investigated are considered a vital source of safe antimicrobial volatile constituents that are recommended as bioactive entities for controlling microbial infection topically or systemically. The proposed mechanistic action encourages further modification of the major EOs chemical structure by adding more polar substitutions to improve the binding affinity and produce more active semisynthetic analogues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.