ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Understanding cognitive control in depression: the interactive role of emotion, expected efficacy and reward.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct effects of monetary versus social reward magnitudes on the emotional congruency effect in subclinical depression: a word-face Stroop study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Behavioral and neural dysfunctions in reward-related cognitive control among adolescents with major depressive disorder.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifficulties in cognitive control over negative emotional stimuli are a key characteristic of depression. The Expected Value of Control (EVC) provides a framework for understanding how cognitive control is allocated, focusing on the motivational factors of efficacy and reward. Efficacy is the likelihood that an effort will result in a specific result, while reward is the value assigned to that outcome. However, the impact of emotion on the estimation of EVC has not been explored. We investigated the interplay between emotion and motivation, using the EVC theoretical framework, in depression.
methodsWe utilized a within-between-subject design. The subjects were healthy controls (n = 31) and those with depression (n = 36), who underwent a clinical diagnostic interview, completed the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and participated in an incentivized Emotional Stroop Paradigm, whereby participants received cues indicating different levels of efficacy (low vs. high) and reward (low vs. high) prior to the targeted stimuli.
resultsSignificant interactions were detected between a) group × emotional valence × efficacy, and b) group × reward regarding accuracy rates on the Emotional Stroop Task. Follow-up analyses revealed that during high-efficacy trials, the Control group demonstrated significantly greater accuracy than the Depressed group for both positive and neutral stimuli. In low-efficacy trials, the Controls were also significantly more accurate than the Depressed group when responding to negative stimuli. Additionally, the Depressed group performed significantly worse than Controls on high-reward trials, no significant difference was detected between the two groups on low-reward trials.
conclusionThe emotional valence of stimuli can influence the assessment of reward efficacy, and individuals with depression may have difficulties focusing on reward cues. Further research is necessary to incorporate emotion into the EVC framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.