Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259292›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2025

Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhi-Bo Xie, Xin-Yu Cheng, Xiao-Yan Li, Yi-Fan Zhang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhi-Bo Xie *Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Xin-Yu Cheng *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200065, China.
Xiao-Yan LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200062, China. lxyshchildren@163.com.
Yi-Fan ZhangDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, China. zhangyifan82@126.com.

Funding

Fund for Excellent Young Scholars of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine No. JYYQ006National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82271151National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82472554Project of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center SHDC12023104Shanghai ChenGuang Program No. 21CGA14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn medical education, Lecture Based Learning (LBL) is the most common way of disseminating information. Team Based Learning (TBL), a new teaching method, is a teacher-guided method that employs teams in a class, showing suitability for medical education. Two teaching methods represent distinct educational approaches, each with its own set of advantages and limitations. In this study, we performed a systemic review on the efficacy of TBL pedagogy in medical education.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched through July 2022. Standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

resultsThe analysis included 33 studies. Our analysis revealed that students utilizing the TBL method exhibited significantly higher pre-( SMD = 0.51, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.92) /post-test (SMD = 0.96, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.22) scores than students with LBL. Students in TBL classes had better development of scores, retention (SMD = 1.03, 95%CI 0.38 to 1.69), engagement (SMD = 2.26, 95%CI 0.23 to 4.29) and higher satisfactory rate (SMD = 1.08, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.29). However, students required more time to independently complete reading materials and preparatory tasks.

conclusionOur study indicates the gratifying effectiveness of TBL application in medical education. TBL pedagogy is compatible with the present medical education and should be generalized in more classrooms.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalGroup ProcessesProblem-Based LearningEducational MeasurementHumansStudents, MedicalTeachingLecture based learningMedical educationMeta-analysisTeam based learning

Identifiers

PMID40259292
PMCPMC12010525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.