ArticleBMC public health2025
Content validation of the teacher food and nutrition-related health and wellbeing questionnaire, a Delphi study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric testing of the teacher food and nutrition-related health and wellbeing questionnaire.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchoolteachers' personal health and wellbeing are priority to ensure quality teaching, positive student outcomes and improving teacher retention. With limited-availability of validated tools to measure teacher food and nutrition (FN) as a component of wellbeing, this study aims to evaluate the content validity of the Teacher Food and Nutrition-related health and wellbeing Questionnaire (TFNQ) to fill this gap.
methodA two-round Delphi was used to refine the questionnaire and establish content validity. Round-one reviewed constructs and lifestyle covariates (LC) for inclusion. Round-two considered construct phrasing, appropriateness of scales and questionnaire order. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted.
resultsRound-one included 23 international experts, with 19 also participating in round-two. After round-one, seven constructs and three LC were removed with two constructs revised into four concise new groupings to refine the TFNQ. In round-two 83% of experts agreed with questionnaire order, and feedback indicated only minor adjustments. The final TFNQ contains 26 FN and wellbeing constructs and three LC.
conclusionThis Delphi study established content validity of the TFNQ to appropriately measure key aspects of FN as a component of wellbeing in schoolteachers. Future testing will evaluate the TFNQ construct validity and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.