Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40259280›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Breaking the silence: confidence and barriers in raising concerns among undergraduate dental students- "a national study".

Layla Hassouneh, Kamran Ali, Rebecca Glanville, Hani Nazzal, Sanaa Aljamani, Nabilah Quadier, Manal Matoug-Elwerfelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Layla HassounehDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Kamran AliCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Rebecca GlanvilleFaculty of Health, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Hani NazzalCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Sanaa AljamaniRestorative department, School of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Nabilah QuadierJordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Manal Matoug-ElwerfelliCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. melwerfelli@qu.edu.qa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRaising concerns in clinical settings, also known as whistleblowing, is vital for safeguarding patient safety and improving the quality of care. Despite research on whistleblowing in medical and nursing fields, there is limited evidence on this topic within dental education. This study aims to assess the self-reported confidence of undergraduate dental students in raising concerns and identify any barriers.

methodsThis cross-sectional study utilized an online close-ended questionnaire distributed via Google Forms to senior undergraduate dental students from Jordan University of Science and Technology and the University of Jordan, Jordan. Data collection was voluntary, with subsequent analysis performed using RStudio (version 2023.06.2) incorporating R version 4.0.5. T-tests and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used to assess significant variations between results by gender and stage of study.

resultsA total of 382 participants were included in the study yielding a response rate of 30.80%. Of these, 257 were female (67.28%) and 125 were male (32.72%). Overall, 169 (44.24%) participants reported that their institutions had a policy document on raising concerns, while only 71 (18.58%) participants reported receiving formal training in raising concerns at their institution. Approximately 45% of participants reported experiencing situations which warranted raising concerns in clinical settings. The overall mean score for all items was 0.13 (95% CI -0.18 to 0.43). The findings revealed that students were marginally confident in raising concerns related to patient safety. However, their confidence was lower when addressing issues related to the conduct of clinical staff or peers. Common barriers reported included fear of causing trouble, lack of support, and fear of being ignored. ANOVA revealed significant variation by gender and year of study, with female students and final-year students reporting greater self-confidence in raising concerns (p < 0.001).

conclusionsNotwithstanding the limitations of the current study, the results show that participants were marginally confident in raising concerns related to patient safety and several barriers to raising concerns were also identified. These findings underscore the need for dental schools to focus on enhancing students' confidence and empowering them to report concerns when warranted. A transparent and supportive culture can contribute to improvements in patient safety and enhancing professionalism of dental students.

Indexed as

Students, DentalWhistleblowingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, DentalFemaleHumansJordanMalePatient SafetySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCurriculumDental studentsEducationPatient safetyRaising concernsWhistleblowing

Identifiers

PMID40259280
PMCPMC12013199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.