ArticleBMC cancer2025
Mecapegfilgrastim prophylaxis for neutropenia in patients with non-myeloid malignancies: A Chinese nationwide real-world study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMecapegfilgrastim has been previously validated for efficacy and safety in neutropenia prevention during clinical trials. This nationwide, real-world study (RWS) evaluates its role in protecting against moderate to severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in Chinese patients with non-myeloid malignancies.
methodsIn this prospective study conducted in the 46 centers across China, the patients with non-myeloid malignancies were enrolled, and received subcutaneous injections of mecapegfilgrastim 24 h after each chemotherapy cycle. Outcomes were monitored over four subsequent chemotherapy cycles. The primary outcome was safety, while secondary outcomes included the incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia (FN), etc.
resultsFrom June 2019 to March 2022, 2,859 patients were enrolled, contributing to 7,763 observed chemotherapy cycles. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were noted in 329 patients (11.5%), with white blood cell count increased being the most common (3.6%). The incidence of grade 3 or higher TRAEs was 1.0%. In the first cycle, 236 (8.3%), 125 (4.4%) and 24 patients (0.8%) reported grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia, and FN, respectively. Across all cycles, the rates of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia and FN were 5.8%, 2.7%, and 0.3%, respectively. Notably, primary prophylaxis was associated with lower incidences of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (7.9%) and grade 4 neutropenia (4.1%) in the first cycle compared to secondary prophylaxis (11.2% and 6.7%, respectively).
conclusionThis RWS reinforces the safety and effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing moderate to severe CIN among the patients with non-myeloid malignancies, with primary prophylaxis showing a lower incidence of neutropenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.