ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Association of serum neurofilament light chain and bone mineral density in adults.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSerum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) is a blood-based marker of neuroaxonal damage increasingly used in neurological research. Although sNFL has been linked to systemic aging and chronic disease, its relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) remains unclear.
methodsWe analyzed data from 1,344 participants aged ≥ 20 years in the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Serum sNFL concentrations were measured using a high-sensitivity immunoassay. Lumbar BMD was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between log-transformed sNFL and BMD, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, metabolic, renal, cognitive, and bone-related covariates. Sensitivity analyses examined osteoporosis, defined as physician diagnosis or T-score ≤ - 2.5, as a binary outcome.
resultsHigher sNFL levels were significantly associated with lower lumbar BMD (fully adjusted β = - 0.02 g/cm² per 1-unit increase in ln-sNFL; 95% CI: - 0.04, - 0.01; P = 0.0089). Compared with the lowest quartile, participants in the highest quartile had a 0.04 g/cm² lower BMD (P for trend = 0.011). Sensitivity analyses confirmed higher odds of osteoporosis with increasing sNFL levels (Q4 vs. Q1 OR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.69, 4.31, P < 0.001).
conclusionElevated serum sNFL concentrations are independently associated with lower lumbar spine BMD in U.S. adults. These findings suggest that sNFL may serve as an exploratory marker of systemic vulnerability relevant to bone health, warranting further longitudinal and mechanistic investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.