ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
Discovery of lncRNA-Based ProsRISK Score in Serum as Potential Biomarkers for Improved Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Detection.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AMACR and ZFPL1 serum biomarkers enhance precision in predicting postoperative prostate cancer outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Noncoding RNAs in periodontitis: Progress and perspectives (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating lncRNAs have emerged as promising biomarkers for the diagnosis of various cancers. This study aimed to establish an accurate risk prediction model based on serum lncRNAs to facilitate the detection of prostate cancer (PCA). RT-qPCR was used to analyse the levels of candidate lncRNAs, and four lncRNAs (NEAT1, ARLNC1, FOXP4-AS1 and DSCAM-AS1) were identified to be differently expressed in serum from 190 PCA patients, 140 benign controls, and 170 healthy controls. A ProsRISK score based on four lncRNAs and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was established in the training set. ROC analysis in the validation set revealed that the ProsRISK demonstrated more powerful capacity in discriminating PCA from healthy and benign controls, with an AUC of 0.926 (95% CI: 0.882-0.970) and 0.837 (95% CI: 0.770-0.904), which were significantly higher than those of the lncRNA panel or PSA alone (all at p < 0.05). Moreover, the ProsRISK showed good diagnostic performance for PCA I-II patients compared with healthy and benign controls, and the corresponding AUCs were 0.905 (95% CI: 0.843-0.968) and 0.819 (95% CI: 0.732-0.907). Our findings indicated that the constructed ProsRISK could be a reliable risk stratification model and have great potential for clinical use to improve the precision surveillance for PCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.